The Joint Committee on Taxation Publishes Data on New BEAT Provision

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act added a new provision to the Internal Revenue Code called the “Base Erosion and Anti-abuse Tax” (BEAT). In April 2019, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) published a report that offers insight into the number of corporations that will be impacted by the BEAT provisions.

The new tax is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. It applies to taxpayers that meet the following criteria:

  • Corporation other than a RIC, REIT, or S corporation,
  • Average annual gross receipts of at least $500 million over the three preceding taxable years; and
  • Base erosion percentage of at least 3 percent for the taxable year (2 percent for certain banks and securities dealers)

As noted in the report, a taxpayer that is a member of an aggregate group determines its status as an applicable taxpayer by reference to the gross receipts and base erosion percentage of the aggregate group.

Base erosion payments include any amounts paid or accrued by a taxpayer to a related foreign party for which a deduction from gross income is allowed. This includes interest payments, royalty payments, and payments for services.

Deductible payments to related foreign persons are added back to taxable income to arrive at modified taxable income.There is also an “add back” for depreciation and amortization deductions associated with property acquired from related foreign persons.

The BEAT is calculated by taking 10 percent of modified taxable income. Note, however, that the rate is 5 percent for years beginning in 2018 to help phase-in the new regime.

Also note that a foreign person is considered a “related person” if it owns at least 25 percent of the stock of the taxpayer (by vote or value) or satisfies other control tests.

Table 1 shows payments to related foreign parties by taxpayers with $500 million or more in gross receipts.Note that the number of corporations with a base erosion percentage at or above the 3-percent threshold is higher for foreign-owned domestic corporations than for U.S. multinationals(835 v. 411).

Table 1 describing Payments to Related Foreign Parties by Taxpayers
Table 1: Payments to Related Foreign Parties by Taxpayers with $500 Million or More in Gross Receipts

A taxpayer’s base erosion percentage is computed by taking the total amount of base erosion tax benefitsfor the year and dividing such amount by the sum of the (1) total amount of deductions allowable to the taxpayer for that year, and (2) any base erosion payments not reflected in (1).

For example, if a taxpayer pays $80 million in salaries to its employees and $20 million in royalty payments to a related foreign party, the base erosion percentageis 20. This is computed by taking the$20 million in base erosion tax benefits and dividing such amountby the $100 million in total deductions.

Table 2 shows the BEAT tax parameters for taxpayers with $500 million or more in gross receipts and a base erosion percentage of 3 percent or more.Here you will see that the median base erosion percentage for U.S. multinationals is 7.75%, while the median for foreign-owned domestic corporations is more than double that amount (15.85%).

BEAT Tax Parameters for Taxpayers with $500Million or More
Table 2: BEAT Tax Parameters for Taxpayers with $500 Million or More in Gross Receipts

The data provided in the JCT report illustrates that the BEAT will likely have a negative impact on foreign companies with U.S. operations. As noted in a prior article, foreign companies in the pharmaceutical and technology sectors are especially vulnerable. It’s not uncommon for companies in these industries to structure payments from the United States to a foreign parent for the rights to sell software or prescription drugs in the United States, thereby reducing the amount of profit taxable by the U.S. government.

In summary, any large company that wants to “defeat the BEAT” will have to review their deductible payments tied to related foreign affiliates, determine if certain exceptions apply, and, if not, evaluate whether restructuring is appropriate to minimize amounts added back taxable income for purposes of the BEAT provisions.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInEmail
mm
Tara Fisher has been practicing international tax for 20 years. Her professional background includes working for the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation, the national tax practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers, the University of Pittsburgh, and American University in Washington D.C. She is a licensed CPA and holds both an undergraduate and graduate degree in accounting from the University of Virginia.